↓ Skip to main content

Targeting Channels and Transporters in Protozoan Parasite Infections

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeting Channels and Transporters in Protozoan Parasite Infections
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2018.00088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Meier, Holger Erler, Eric Beitz

Abstract

Infectious diseases caused by pathogenic protozoa are among the most significant causes of death in humans. Therapeutic options are scarce and massively challenged by the emergence of resistant parasite strains. Many of the current anti-parasite drugs target soluble enzymes, generate unspecific oxidative stress, or act by an unresolved mechanism within the parasite. In recent years, collections of drug-like compounds derived from large-scale phenotypic screenings, such as the malaria or pathogen box, have been made available to researchers free of charge boosting the identification of novel promising targets. Remarkably, several of the compound hits have been found to inhibit membrane proteins at the periphery of the parasites, i.e., channels and transporters for ions and metabolites. In this review, we will focus on the progress made on targeting channels and transporters at different levels and the potential for use against infections with apicomplexan parasites mainly Plasmodium spp. (malaria) and Toxoplasma gondii (toxoplasmosis), with kinetoplastids Trypanosoma brucei (sleeping sickness), Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas disease), and Leishmania ssp. (leishmaniasis), and the amoeba Entamoeba histolytica (amoebiasis).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Chemistry 5 4%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,461,883
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#459
of 6,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,916
of 330,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#21
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.