You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On the Difference Between Additive and Subtractive QM/MM Calculations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2018.00089 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lili Cao, Ulf Ryde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 22% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Turkey | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Sweden | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 57 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,129,312
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#160
of 6,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,615
of 344,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#12
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,832 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.