↓ Skip to main content

Antimicrobial Peptides: Interaction With Model and Biological Membranes and Synergism With Chemical Antibiotics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Readers on

mendeley
324 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antimicrobial Peptides: Interaction With Model and Biological Membranes and Synergism With Chemical Antibiotics
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2018.00204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Axel Hollmann, Melina Martinez, Patricia Maturana, Liliana C. Semorile, Paulo C. Maffia

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are promising novel antibiotics since they have shown antimicrobial activity against a wide range of bacterial species, including multiresistant bacteria; however, toxicity is the major barrier to convert antimicrobial peptides into active drugs. A profound and proper understanding of the complex interactions between these peptides and biological membranes using biophysical tools and model membranes seems to be a key factor in the race to develop a suitable antimicrobial peptide therapy for clinical use. In the search for such therapy, different combined approaches with conventional antibiotics have been evaluated in recent years and demonstrated to improve the therapeutic potential of AMPs. Some of these approaches have revealed promising additive or synergistic activity between AMPs and chemical antibiotics. This review will give an insight into the possibilities that physicochemical tools can give in the AMPs research and also address the state of the art on the current promising combined therapies between AMPs and conventional antibiotics, which appear to be a plausible future opportunity for AMPs treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 324 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 17%
Student > Master 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 8%
Researcher 24 7%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 98 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 76 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 10%
Chemistry 30 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 113 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,212,637
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#175
of 6,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,810
of 334,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#10
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,448 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.