↓ Skip to main content

Facile Preparation of Hydrophobic Aluminum Oxide Film via Sol-Gel Method

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facile Preparation of Hydrophobic Aluminum Oxide Film via Sol-Gel Method
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2018.00308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Changqing Fang, Mengyuan Pu, Xing Zhou, Wanqing Lei, Lu Pei, Chenxi Wang

Abstract

Hydrophobic aluminum oxide films (AOFs) are widely used in anti-oxidation and anti-corrosion applications. In preparing AOFs, complex and high temperature conditions are usually necessary. Here, we report aluminum nanowire structures with hydrophobic properties, prepared using a facile sol-gel method by magnetic stirrer and hydrothermal reaction. The electromagnetic force work has great influence on the structure of AOFs. The surface morphology and compositions of the AOFs were analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spec-trometers (EDS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), 3M peeling test, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). With the increase of water content in hydrothermal reaction, the hydrophobicity of AOFs proportional increased. Adding 10 ml deionized water leads to the formation of the upper nanowires and the lower nanohole with 129.3° water contact angle. Meanwhile, the AOF provide a good substrate for electroless deposition (ELD) of copper (Cu) to achieve a simple fabrication of metal conductor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 29%
Engineering 3 13%
Materials Science 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2021.
All research outputs
#14,753,796
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#1,173
of 5,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,784
of 328,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#57
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,877 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.