↓ Skip to main content

Anisotropic Polymer Adsorption on Molybdenite Basal and Edge Surfaces and Interaction Mechanism With Air Bubbles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anisotropic Polymer Adsorption on Molybdenite Basal and Edge Surfaces and Interaction Mechanism With Air Bubbles
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2018.00361
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Xie, Jingyi Wang, Jun Huang, Xin Cui, Xiaogang Wang, Qingxia Liu, Hao Zhang, Qi Liu, Hongbo Zeng

Abstract

The anisotropic surface characteristics and interaction mechanisms of molybdenite (MoS2) basal and edge planes have attracted much research interest in many interfacial processes such as froth flotation. In this work, the adsorption of a polymer depressant [i.e., carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)] on both MoS2 basal and edge surfaces as well as their interaction mechanisms with air bubbles have been characterized by atomic force microscope (AFM) imaging and quantitative force measurements. AFM imaging showed that the polymer coverage on the basal plane increased with elevating polymer concentration, with the formation of a compact polymer layer at 100 ppm CMC; however, the polymer adsorption was much weaker on the edge plane. The anisotropy in polymer adsorption on MoS2 basal and edge surfaces coincided with water contact angle results. Direct force measurements using CMC functionalized AFM tips revealed that the adhesion on the basal plane was about an order of magnitude higher than that on the edge plane, supporting the anisotropic CMC adsorption behaviors. Such adhesion difference could be attributed to their difference in surface hydrophobicity and surface charge, with weakened hydrophobic attraction and strengthened electrostatic repulsion between the polymers and edge plane. Force measurements using a bubble probe AFM showed that air bubble could attach to the basal plane during approach, which could be effectively inhibited after polymer adsorption. The edge surface, due to the negligible polymer adsorption, showed similar interaction behaviors with air bubbles before and after polymer treatment. This work provides useful information on the adsorption of polymers on MoS2 basal/edge surfaces as well as their interaction mechanism with air bubbles at the nanoscale, with implications for the design and development of effective polymer additives to mediate the bubble attachment on solid particles with anisotropic surface properties in mineral flotation and other engineering processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 16%
Chemical Engineering 2 11%
Materials Science 2 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,530,891
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,950
of 6,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,758
of 333,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#93
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,040 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.