↓ Skip to main content

Can X-Ray Powder Diffraction Be a Suitable Forensic Method for Illicit Drug Identification?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can X-Ray Powder Diffraction Be a Suitable Forensic Method for Illicit Drug Identification?
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, June 2020
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2020.00499
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bronislav Jurásek, Vilém Bartůněk, Štěpán Huber, Patrik Fagan, Vladimír Setnička, František Králík, Wim Dehaen, Daniel Svozil, Martin Kuchař

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 25%
Student > Master 5 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 20%
Materials Science 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Chemistry 2 10%
Other 5 25%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,487,252
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#1,068
of 6,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,777
of 400,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#50
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,083 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.