You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to Study the Metabolism of New Psychoactive Substances for the Purpose of Toxicological Screenings—A Follow-Up Study Comparing Pooled Human Liver S9, HepaRG Cells, and Zebrafish Larvae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2020.00539 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lea Wagmann, Fabian Frankenfeld, Yu Mi Park, Jennifer Herrmann, Svenja Fischmann, Folker Westphal, Rolf Müller, Veit Flockerzi, Markus R. Meyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 11 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,705,377
of 24,739,153 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#465
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,922
of 371,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#26
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,739,153 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.