You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Review Study on Sulfate-Radical-Based Advanced Oxidation Processes for Domestic/Industrial Wastewater Treatment: Degradation, Efficiency, and Mechanism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2020.592056 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xinhui Xia, Fengyi Zhu, Jianju Li, Haizhou Yang, Liangliang Wei, Qiaoyang Li, Junqiu Jiang, Guangshan Zhang, Qingliang Zhao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 276 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 11% |
| Researcher | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 126 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 34 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 28 | 10% |
| Engineering | 25 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 141 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,782,332
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#235
of 6,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,777
of 509,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#16
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.