↓ Skip to main content

Diaportones A–C: Three New Metabolites From Endophytic Fungus Diaporthe foeniculina BZM-15

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diaportones A–C: Three New Metabolites From Endophytic Fungus Diaporthe foeniculina BZM-15
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2021.755351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fenghua Kang, Xiuxiang Lu, Sha Zhang, Dekun Chen, Min Kuang, Weiwei Peng, Jianbing Tan, Kangping Xu, Zhenxing Zou, Haibo Tan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,272
of 6,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#365,149
of 510,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#136
of 347 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 347 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.