You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Probing long-lived radioactive isotopes on the double-logarithmic Segrè chart
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Chemistry, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fchem.2024.1057928 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haitao Shang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,400,145
of 25,890,819 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#1,269
of 6,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,054
of 362,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#15
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,890,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,840 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.