↓ Skip to main content

Proanthocyanidins isolated from the leaves of Ficus glomerata evaluated on the activities of rumen enzymes: in vitro and in silico studies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Chemistry, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proanthocyanidins isolated from the leaves of Ficus glomerata evaluated on the activities of rumen enzymes: in vitro and in silico studies
Published in
Frontiers in Chemistry, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fchem.2024.1359049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suman Lata, Pushpendra Koli, Sultan Singh, Brijesh Kumar Bhadoria, Umesh Chand, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Thamer Al-Shuwaili, Yonglin Ren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#21,052,735
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Chemistry
#2,527
of 6,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,183
of 352,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Chemistry
#29
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.