↓ Skip to main content

Inferring Reasons for the Failure of Staphylococcus aureus Vaccines in Clinical Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inferring Reasons for the Failure of Staphylococcus aureus Vaccines in Clinical Trials
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Bagnoli, Sylvie Bertholet, Guido Grandi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 90 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 23%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 34%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,695,994
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#928
of 6,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,942
of 244,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#26
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.