↓ Skip to main content

Mycobacterial signaling through toll-like receptors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mycobacterial signaling through toll-like receptors
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joyoti Basu, Dong-Min Shin, Eun-Kyeong Jo

Abstract

Studies over the past decade have helped to decipher molecular networks dependent on Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling, in mycobacteria-infected macrophages. Stimulation of TLRs by mycobacteria and their antigenic components rapidly induces intracellular signaling cascades involved in the activation of nuclear factor-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, which play important roles in orchestrating proinflammatory responses and innate defense through generation of a variety of antimicrobial effector molecules. Recent studies have provided evidence that mycobacterial TLR-signaling cross talks with other intracellular antimicrobial innate pathways, the autophagy process and functional vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling. In this article we describe recent advances in the recognition, responses, and regulation of mycobacterial signaling through TLRs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 167 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 17%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 37 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 33 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 38 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,174,175
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#5,864
of 6,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,211
of 244,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#88
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.