↓ Skip to main content

Role and regulation of heme iron acquisition in gram-negative pathogens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role and regulation of heme iron acquisition in gram-negative pathogens
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura J. Runyen-Janecky

Abstract

Bacteria that reside in animal tissues and/or cells must acquire iron from their host. However, almost all of the host iron is sequestered in iron-containing compounds and proteins, the majority of which is found within heme molecules. Thus, likely iron sources for bacterial pathogens (and non-pathogenic symbionts) are free heme and heme-containing proteins. Furthermore, the cellular location of the bacterial within the host (intra or extracellular) influences the amount and nature of the iron containing compounds available for transport. The low level of free iron in the host, coupled with the presence of numerous different heme sources, has resulted in a wide range of high-affinity iron acquisition strategies within bacteria. However, since excess iron and heme are toxic to bacteria, expression of these acquisition systems is highly regulated. Precise expression in the correct host environment at the appropriate times enables heme iron acquisitions systems to contribute to the growth of bacterial pathogens within the host. This mini-review will highlight some of the recent findings in these areas for gram-negative pathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 32%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,205,224
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#5,890
of 6,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,792
of 280,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#77
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.