↓ Skip to main content

Role of DUOX in gut inflammation: lessons from Drosophila model of gut-microbiota interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of DUOX in gut inflammation: lessons from Drosophila model of gut-microbiota interactions
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sung-Hee Kim, Won-Jae Lee

Abstract

It is well-known that certain bacterial species can colonize the gut epithelium and induce inflammation in the mucosa, whereas other species are either benign or beneficial to the host. Deregulation of the gut-microbe interactions may lead to a pathogenic condition in the host, such as chronic inflammation, tissue injuries, and even cancer. However, our current understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie gut-microbe homeostasis and pathogenesis remains limited. Recent studies have used Drosophila as a genetic model to provide novel insights into the causes and consequences of bacterial-induced colitis in the intestinal mucosa. The present review discusses the interactions that occur between gut-associated bacteria and host gut immunity, particularly the bacterial-induced intestinal dual oxidase (DUOX) system. Several lines of evidence showed that the bacterial-modulated DUOX system is involved in microbial clearance, intestinal epithelial cell renewal (ECR), redox-dependent modulation of signaling pathways, cross-linking of biomolecules, and discrimination between symbionts and pathogens. Further genetic studies on the Drosophila DUOX system and on gut-associated bacteria with a distinct ability to activate DUOX may provide critical information related to the homeostatic inflammation as well as etiology of chronic inflammatory diseases, which will enhance our understanding on the mucosal inflammatory diseases frequently observed in the microbe-contacting epithelia of humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 237 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 25%
Researcher 43 18%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 40 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 45 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2014.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#5,196
of 6,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,464
of 309,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.