↓ Skip to main content

Transition metal ions at the crossroads of mucosal immunity and microbial pathogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transition metal ions at the crossroads of mucosal immunity and microbial pathogenesis
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vladimir E. Diaz-Ochoa, Stefan Jellbauer, Suzi Klaus, Manuela Raffatellu

Abstract

Transition metal ions are essential micronutrients for all living organisms. In mammals, these ions are often protein-bound and sequestered within cells, limiting their availability to microbes. Moreover, in response to infection, mammalian hosts further reduce the availability of metal nutrients by activating epithelial cells and recruiting neutrophils, both of which release metal-binding proteins with antimicrobial function. Microorganisms, in turn, have evolved sophisticated systems to overcome these limitations and acquire the metal ions essential for their growth. Here we review some of the mechanisms employed by the host and by pathogenic microorganisms to compete for transition metal ions, with a discussion of how evading "nutritional immunity" benefits pathogens. Furthermore, we provide new insights on the mechanisms of host-microbe competition for metal ions in the mucosa, particularly in the inflamed gut.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 127 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 22%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Master 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 8%
Chemistry 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 34 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#12,891,407
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1,837
of 6,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,677
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.