↓ Skip to main content

Shifting the paradigm from pathogens to pathobiome: new concepts in the light of meta-omics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
28 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
238 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
444 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shifting the paradigm from pathogens to pathobiome: new concepts in the light of meta-omics
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muriel Vayssier-Taussat, Emmanuel Albina, Christine Citti, Jean-Franҫois Cosson, Marie-Agnès Jacques, Marc-Henri Lebrun, Yves Le Loir, Mylène Ogliastro, Marie-Agnès Petit, Philippe Roumagnac, Thierry Candresse

Abstract

The concept of pathogenesis has evolved considerably over recent years, and the scenario "a microbe + virulence factors = disease" is probably far from reality in a number of cases. Actual pathogens have extremely broad biological diversity and are found in all major groups of microorganisms (viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa…). Their pathogenicity results from strong and often highly specific interactions they have with either their microbial environment, hosts and/or arthropod vectors. In this review, we explore the contribution of metagenomic approaches toward understanding pathogens within the context of microbial communities. With this broader view, we discussed the concept of "pathobiome" and the research questions that this raises.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 431 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 22%
Researcher 90 20%
Student > Master 47 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 7%
Professor 25 6%
Other 79 18%
Unknown 75 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 193 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 6%
Environmental Science 20 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 4%
Other 45 10%
Unknown 97 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#437,015
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#73
of 8,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,746
of 235,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.