You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative review of Francisella tularensis and Francisella novicida
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luke C. Kingry, Jeannine M. Petersen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 22% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#4,591
of 8,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,785
of 239,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.