↓ Skip to main content

CRISPR-Cas systems: new players in gene regulation and bacterial physiology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CRISPR-Cas systems: new players in gene regulation and bacterial physiology
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy R. Sampson, David S. Weiss

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas systems are bacterial defenses against foreign nucleic acids derived from bacteriophages, plasmids or other sources. These systems are targeted in an RNA-dependent, sequence-specific manner, and are also adaptive, providing protection against previously encountered foreign elements. In addition to their canonical function in defense against foreign nucleic acid, their roles in various aspects of bacterial physiology are now being uncovered. We recently revealed a role for a Cas9-based Type II CRISPR-Cas system in the control of endogenous gene expression, a novel form of prokaryotic gene regulation. Cas9 functions in association with two small RNAs to target and alter the stability of an endogenous transcript encoding a bacterial lipoprotein (BLP). Since BLPs are recognized by the host innate immune protein Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2), CRISPR-Cas-mediated repression of BLP expression facilitates evasion of TLR2 by the intracellular bacterial pathogen Francisella novicida, and is essential for its virulence. Here we describe the Cas9 regulatory system in detail, as well as data on its role in controlling virulence traits of Neisseria meningitidis and Campylobacter jejuni. We also discuss potential roles of CRISPR-Cas systems in the response to envelope stress and other aspects of bacterial physiology. Since ~45% of bacteria and ~83% of Archaea encode these machineries, the newly appreciated regulatory functions of CRISPR-Cas systems are likely to play broad roles in controlling the pathogenesis and physiology of diverse prokaryotes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 246 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 26%
Researcher 49 18%
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 4%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 44 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 68 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 45 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2016.
All research outputs
#4,131,235
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#822
of 6,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,331
of 226,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.