You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges in the culture-independent analysis of oral and respiratory samples from intubated patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00065 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vladimir Lazarevic, Nadia Gaïa, Stéphane Emonet, Myriam Girard, Gesuele Renzi, Lena Despres, Hannah Wozniak, Javier Yugueros Marcos, Jean-Baptiste Veyrieras, Sonia Chatellier, Alex van Belkum, Jérôme Pugin, Jacques Schrenzel |
| Abstract |
The spread of microorganisms in hospitals is an important public health threat, and yet few studies have assessed how human microbial communities (microbiota) evolve in the hospital setting. Studies conducted so far have mainly focused on a limited number of bacterial species, mostly pathogenic ones and primarily during outbreaks. We explored the bacterial community diversity of the microbiota from oral and respiratory samples of intubated patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit and we discuss the technical challenges that may arise while using culture-independent approaches to study these types of samples. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 24% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,781,727
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#3,146
of 6,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,740
of 226,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.