↓ Skip to main content

Morphologic and molecular evaluation of Chlamydia trachomatis growth in human endocervix reveals distinct growth patterns

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morphologic and molecular evaluation of Chlamydia trachomatis growth in human endocervix reveals distinct growth patterns
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria E. Lewis, Robert J. Belland, Yasser M. AbdelRahman, Wandy L. Beatty, Ashok A. Aiyar, Arnold H. Zea, Sheila J. Greene, Luis Marrero, Lyndsey R. Buckner, David J. Tate, Chris L. McGowin, Pamela A. Kozlowski, Michelle O'Brien, Rebecca A. Lillis, David H. Martin, Alison J. Quayle

Abstract

In vitro models of Chlamydia trachomatis growth have long been studied to predict growth in vivo. Alternative or persistent growth modes in vitro have been shown to occur under the influence of numerous stressors but have not been studied in vivo. Here, we report the development of methods for sampling human infections from the endocervix in a manner that permits a multifaceted analysis of the bacteria, host and the endocervical environment. Our approach permits evaluating total bacterial load, transcriptional patterns, morphology by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy, and levels of cytokines and nutrients in the infection microenvironment. By applying this approach to two pilot patients with disparate infections, we have determined that their contrasting growth patterns correlate with strikingly distinct transcriptional biomarkers, and are associated with differences in local levels of IFNγ. Our multifaceted approach will be useful to dissect infections in the human host and be useful in identifying patients at risk for chronic disease. Importantly, the molecular and morphological analyses described here indicate that persistent growth forms can be isolated from the human endocervix when the infection microenvironment resembles the in vitro model of IFNγ-induced persistence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,874
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#4,778
of 6,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,497
of 229,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#18
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.