You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in human, cattle, and foods. Strategies for detection and control
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00089 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nora L. Padola, Analía I. Etcheverría |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,103,518
of 24,315,442 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1,857
of 7,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,105
of 232,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,315,442 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.