↓ Skip to main content

Effect of an oxygenating agent on oral bacteria in vitro and on dental plaque composition in healthy young adults

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of an oxygenating agent on oral bacteria in vitro and on dental plaque composition in healthy young adults
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00095
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mercedes Fernandez y Mostajo, Wil A. van der Reijden, Mark J. Buijs, Wouter Beertsen, Fridus van der Weijden, Wim Crielaard, Egija Zaura

Abstract

Oral bacteria live in symbiosis with the host. Therefore, when mouthwashes are indicated, selective inhibition of taxa contributing to disease is preferred instead of broad-spectrum antimicrobials. The potential selectivity of an oxygenating mouthwash, Ardox-X® (AX), has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial potential of AX and the effects of a twice-daily oral rinse on dental plaque composition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 26 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#13,790,674
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,310
of 6,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,504
of 230,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.