↓ Skip to main content

Fungal-bacterial interactions and their relevance to oral health: linking the clinic and the bench

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fungal-bacterial interactions and their relevance to oral health: linking the clinic and the bench
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia I. Diaz, Linda D. Strausbaugh, Anna Dongari-Bagtzoglou

Abstract

High throughput sequencing has accelerated knowledge on the oral microbiome. While the bacterial component of oral communities has been extensively characterized, the role of the fungal microbiota in the oral cavity is largely unknown. Interactions among fungi and bacteria are likely to influence oral health as exemplified by the synergistic relationship between Candida albicans and oral streptococci. In this perspective, we discuss the current state of the field of fungal-bacterial interactions in the context of the oral cavity. We highlight the need to conduct longitudinal clinical studies to simultaneously characterize the bacterial and fungal components of the human oral microbiome in health and during disease progression. Such studies need to be coupled with investigations using disease-relevant models to mechanistically test the associations observed in humans and eventually identify fungal-bacterial interactions that could serve as preventive or therapeutic targets for oral diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 23%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 10%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,160,120
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#354
of 6,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,421
of 230,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.