↓ Skip to main content

Glycosaminoglycans analogs from marine invertebrates: structure, biological effects, and potential as new therapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glycosaminoglycans analogs from marine invertebrates: structure, biological effects, and potential as new therapeutics
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mauro S. G. Pavão

Abstract

In this review, several glycosaminoglycan analogs obtained from different marine invertebrate are reported. The structure, biological activity and mechanism of action of these unique molecules are detailed reviewed and exemplified by experiments in vitro and in vivo. Among the glycans studied are low-sulfated heparin-like polymers from ascidians, containing significant anticoagulant activity and no bleeding effect; dermatan sulfates with significant neurite outgrowth promoting activity and anti-P-selectin from ascidians, and a unique fucosylated chondroitin sulfate from sea cucumbers, possessing anticoagulant activity after oral administration and high anti P- and L-selectin activities. The therapeutic value and safety of these invertebrate glycans have been extensively proved by several experimental animal models of diseases, including thrombosis, inflammation and metastasis. These invertebrate glycans can be obtained in high concentrations from marine organisms that have been used as a food source for decades, and usually obtained from marine farms in sufficient quantities to be used as starting material for new therapeutics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Chemistry 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,264,045
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#5,926
of 6,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,271
of 239,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#27
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.