↓ Skip to main content

The impact of horizontal gene transfer on the adaptive ability of the human oral microbiome

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of horizontal gene transfer on the adaptive ability of the human oral microbiome
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam P. Roberts, Jens Kreth

Abstract

The oral microbiome is composed of a multitude of different species of bacteria, each capable of occupying one or more of the many different niches found within the human oral cavity. This community exhibits many types of complex interactions which enable it to colonize and rapidly respond to changes in the environment in which they live. One of these interactions is the transfer, or acquisition, of DNA within this environment, either from co-resident bacterial species or from exogenous sources. Horizontal gene transfer in the oral cavity gives some of the resident bacteria the opportunity to sample a truly enormous metagenome affording them considerable adaptive potential which may be key to survival in such a varying environment. In this review the underlying mechanisms of HGT are discussed in relation to the oral microbiome with numerous examples described where the direct acquisition of exogenous DNA has contributed to the fitness of the bacterial host within the human oral cavity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 217 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 27%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Researcher 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 43 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 8%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 50 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,680,831
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,945
of 6,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,890
of 240,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.