You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Salmonella—how a metabolic generalist adopts an intracellular lifestyle during infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00191 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Dandekar, Astrid Fieselmann, Eva Fischer, Jasmin Popp, Michael Hensel, Janina Noster |
| Abstract |
The human-pathogenic bacterium Salmonella enterica adjusts and adapts to different environments while attempting colonization. In the course of infection nutrient availabilities change drastically. New techniques, "-omics" data and subsequent integration by systems biology improve our understanding of these changes. We review changes in metabolism focusing on amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism. Furthermore, the adaptation process is associated with the activation of genes of the Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPIs). Anti-infective strategies have to take these insights into account and include metabolic and other strategies. Salmonella infections will remain a challenge for infection biology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cameroon | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 19% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 21 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#20,031,563
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#4,863
of 8,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,328
of 362,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.