↓ Skip to main content

Streptococcus pyogenes biofilms—formation, biology, and clinical relevance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Streptococcus pyogenes biofilms—formation, biology, and clinical relevance
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, February 2015
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomas Fiedler, Thomas Köller, Bernd Kreikemeyer

Abstract

Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococci, GAS) is an exclusive human bacterial pathogen. The virulence potential of this species is tremendous. Interactions with humans range from asymptomatic carriage over mild and superficial infections of skin and mucosal membranes up to systemic purulent toxic-invasive disease manifestations. Particularly the latter are a severe threat for predisposed patients and lead to significant death tolls worldwide. This places GAS among the most important Gram-positive bacterial pathogens. Many recent reviews have highlighted the GAS repertoire of virulence factors, regulators and regulatory circuits/networks that enable GAS to colonize the host and to deal with all levels of the host immune defense. This covers in vitro and in vivo studies, including animal infection studies based on mice and more relevant, macaque monkeys. It is now appreciated that GAS, like many other bacterial species, do not necessarily exclusively live in a planktonic lifestyle. GAS is capable of microcolony and biofilm formation on host cells and tissues. We are now beginning to understand that this feature significantly contributes to GAS pathogenesis. In this review we will discuss the current knowledge on GAS biofilm formation, the biofilm-phenotype associated virulence factors, regulatory aspects of biofilm formation, the clinical relevance, and finally contemporary treatment regimens and future treatment options.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 235 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 14%
Student > Master 31 13%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 73 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 11%
Chemistry 8 3%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 76 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#17,749,774
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#4,068
of 6,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,187
of 357,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#21
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.