↓ Skip to main content

Opening the black box of Anaplasma phagocytophilum diversity: current situation and future perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opening the black box of Anaplasma phagocytophilum diversity: current situation and future perspectives
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thibaud Dugat, Anne-Claire Lagrée, Renaud Maillard, Henri-Jean Boulouis, Nadia Haddad

Abstract

Anaplasma phagocytophilum is a zoonotic obligate intracellular bacterium known to be transmitted by ticks belonging to the Ixodes persulcatus complex. This bacterium can infect several mammalian species, and is known to cause diseases with variable symptoms in many domestic animals. Specifically, it is the causative agent of tick-borne fever (TBF), a disease of important economic impact in European domestic ruminants, and human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA), an emerging zoonotic disease in Asia, USA and Europe. A. phagocytophilum epidemiological cycles are complex and involve different ecotypes, vectors, and mammalian host species. Moreover, the epidemiology of A. phagocytophilum infection differs greatly between Europe and the USA. These different epidemiological contexts are associated with considerable variations in bacterial strains. Until recently, few A. phagocytophilum molecular typing tools were available, generating difficulties in completely elucidating the epidemiological cycles of this bacterium. Over the last few years, many A. phagocytophilum typing techniques have been developed, permitting in-depth epidemiological exploration. Here, we review the current knowledge and future perspectives regarding A. phagocytophilum epidemiology and phylogeny, and then focus on the molecular typing tools available for studying A. phagocytophilum genetic diversity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 128 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 36 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 25 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 41 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,289,359
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1,202
of 6,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,171
of 264,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.