↓ Skip to main content

Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome: Pathogenesis and Clinical Picture

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome: Pathogenesis and Clinical Picture
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Jiang, Hong Du, Li M. Wang, Ping Z. Wang, Xue F. Bai

Abstract

Hantaan virus (HTNV) causes hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS), which is a zoonosis endemic in eastern Asia, especially in China. The reservoir host of HTNV is field mouse (Apodemus agraricus). The main manifestation of HFRS, including acute kidney injury, increases vascular permeability, and coagulation abnormalities. In this paper, we review the current knowledge of the pathogenesis of HFRS including virus factor, immunity factor and host genetic factors. Furthermore, the treatment and prevention will be discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 36 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,438,910
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#421
of 8,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,144
of 406,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#5
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.