↓ Skip to main content

F. novicida-Infected A. castellanii Does Not Enhance Bacterial Virulence in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
F. novicida-Infected A. castellanii Does Not Enhance Bacterial Virulence in Mice
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mateja Ozanic, Ivana Gobin, Martin Brezovec, Valentina Marecic, Zlatko Trobonjaca, Yousef Abu Kwaik, Marina Santic

Abstract

Francisella tularensis is a facultative intracellular bacterium that causes tularemia in humans and animals. Epidemiology of tularemia worldwide is often associated with water-borne transmission, which includes mosquitoes and amoebae as the potential host reservoirs of the bacteria in water environment. In vitro studies showed intracellular replication of F. tularensis within Acanthamoeba castellanii and Hartmanella vermiformis cells. While infection of amoeba by Legionella pneumophila has been shown to enhance infectivity of L. pneumophila the role of F. tularensis-infected protozoa in the pathogenesis of tularemia is not known. We used 6 h coculture of A. castellanii and F. novicida for investigation of the effect of inhaled amoeba on the pathogenesis of tularemia on in vivo model. Balb/c mice were infected intratracheally with F. novicida or with F. novicida-infected A. castellanii. Surprisingly, infection with F. novicida-infected A. castellanii did not lead to bronchopneumonia in Balb/c mice, and Francisella did not disseminate into the liver and spleen. Upon inhalation, F. novicida infects a variety of host cells, though neutrophils are the predominant cells early during infection in the lung infiltrates of pulmonary tularemia. The numbers of neutrophils in the lungs of Balb/c mice were significantly lower in the infection of mice with F. novicida-infected A. castellanii in comparison to group of mice infected only with F. novicida. These results demonstrate that following inoculation of mice with F. novicida-infected A. castellanii, mice did not develop tularemia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 30%
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,458,033
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#4,854
of 6,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,836
of 334,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.