↓ Skip to main content

MTMR4 Is Required for the Stability of the Salmonella-Containing Vacuole

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MTMR4 Is Required for the Stability of the Salmonella-Containing Vacuole
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei X. Teo, Markus C. Kerr, Rohan D. Teasdale

Abstract

The intracellular pathogen Salmonella enterica servovar Typhimurium (S.typhimurium) modulates the host cell's phosphoinositide (PI) metabolism to establish its intracellular replicative niche, the Salmonella-containing vacuole (SCV). Upon invasion, phosphoinositide 3-phosphate (PI(3)P) and other early endosomal markers are rapidly recruited to and remain associated with the SCV throughout its early maturation. While the phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase myotubularin 4 (MTMR4) has an established role in regulating autophagy and cellular PI(3)P-content, two processes associated with the intracellular survival of S. typhimurium, a direct role for MTMR4 in Salmonella biology has not been examined. Here we demonstrate that GFP-tagged MTMR4 is recruited to the SCV and infection of cells depleted of endogenous MTMR4 results in a decrease in viable intracellular Salmonella. This reflects a significant increase in the proportion of SCVs with compromised integrity, which targets the compartment for autophagy and consequent bacterial cell death. These findings highlight the importance of PI(3)P regulation to the integrity of the SCV and reveal a novel role for the myotubularins in bacterial pathogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 33%
Student > Bachelor 4 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#6,020
of 8,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,571
of 348,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#35
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.