↓ Skip to main content

Chaperone-Usher Pili Loci of Colonization Factor-Negative Human Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chaperone-Usher Pili Loci of Colonization Factor-Negative Human Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2017
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felipe Del Canto, Miguel O'Ryan, Mirka Pardo, Alexia Torres, Daniela Gutiérrez, Leandro Cádiz, Raul Valdés, Aquiles Mansilla, Rodrigo Martínez, Daniela Hernández, Benjamin Caro, Myron M. Levine, David A. Rasko, Christopher M. Hill, Mihai Pop, O. Colin Stine, Roberto Vidal

Abstract

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is one of the most common causes of diarrhea worldwide. Among the 25 different ETEC adhesins, 22 are known as "colonization factors" (CFs), of which 17 are assembled by the chaperone-usher (CU) mechanism. Currently, there is no preventive therapy against ETEC, and CFs have been proposed as components for vaccine development. However, studies of diarrhea-causing ETEC strains worldwide indicate that between 15 and 50% of these are negative for known CFs, hindering the selection of the most widespread structures and suggesting that unknown adhesins remain to be identified. Here, we report the result of a comprehensive analysis of 35 draft genomes of ETEC strains which do not carry known adhesin genes; our goal was to find new CU pili loci. The phylogenetic profiles and serogroups of these strains were highly diverse, a majority of which produced only the heat-labile toxin. We identified 10 pili loci belonging to CU families β (1 locus), γ2 (7 loci), κ (1 locus), and π (1 locus), all of which contained the required number of open reading frames (ORFs) to encode functional structures. Three loci were variants of previously-known clusters, three had been only-partially described, and four are novel loci. Intra-loci genetic variability identified would allow the synthesis of up to 14 different structures. Clusters of putative γ2-CU pili were most common (23 strains), followed by putative β-CU pili (12 strains), which have not yet been fully characterized. Overall, our findings significantly increase the number of ETEC adhesion genes associated with human infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Engineering 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#14,021,919
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,450
of 6,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,409
of 420,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#28
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.