↓ Skip to main content

Engineering of Genetically Arrested Parasites (GAPs) For a Precision Malaria Vaccine

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engineering of Genetically Arrested Parasites (GAPs) For a Precision Malaria Vaccine
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oriana Kreutzfeld, Katja Müller, Kai Matuschewski

Abstract

Continuous stage conversion and swift changes in the antigenic repertoire in response to acquired immunity are hallmarks of complex eukaryotic pathogens, including Plasmodium species, the causative agents of malaria. Efficient elimination of Plasmodium liver stages prior to blood infection is one of the most promising malaria vaccine strategies. Here, we describe different genetically arrested parasites (GAPs) that have been engineered in Plasmodium berghei, P. yoelii and P. falciparum and compare their vaccine potential. A better understanding of the immunological mechanisms of prime and boost by arrested sporozoites and experimental strategies to enhance vaccine efficacy by further engineering existing GAPs into a more immunogenic form hold promise for continuous improvements of GAP-based vaccines. A critical hurdle for vaccines that elicit long-lasting protection against malaria, such as GAPs, is safety and efficacy in vulnerable populations. Vaccine research should focus on solutions toward turning malaria into a vaccine-preventable disease, which would offer an exciting new path of malaria control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,255,457
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#374
of 6,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,721
of 316,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#15
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.