↓ Skip to main content

Swiss Army Pathogen: The Salmonella Entry Toolkit

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Swiss Army Pathogen: The Salmonella Entry Toolkit
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, August 2017
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J. Hume, Vikash Singh, Anthony C. Davidson, Vassilis Koronakis

Abstract

Salmonella causes disease in humans and animals ranging from mild self-limiting gastroenteritis to potentially life-threatening typhoid fever. Salmonellosis remains a considerable cause of morbidity and mortality globally, and hence imposes a huge socio-economic burden worldwide. A key property of all pathogenic Salmonella strains is the ability to invade non-phagocytic host cells. The major determinant of this invasiveness is a Type 3 Secretion System (T3SS), a molecular syringe that injects virulence effector proteins directly into target host cells. These effectors cooperatively manipulate multiple host cell signaling pathways to drive pathogen internalization. Salmonella does not only rely on these injected effectors, but also uses several other T3SS-independent mechanisms to gain entry into host cells. This review summarizes our current understanding of the methods used by Salmonella for cell invasion, with a focus on the host signaling networks that must be coordinately exploited for the pathogen to achieve its goal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 24%
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 54 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 46 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 54 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,580,127
of 24,176,645 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#454
of 7,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,644
of 321,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#11
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,176,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.