↓ Skip to main content

Neurological Manifestations of Dengue Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurological Manifestations of Dengue Infection
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00449
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guo-Hong Li, Zhi-Jie Ning, Yi-Ming Liu, Xiao-Hong Li

Abstract

Dengue counts among the most commonly encountered arboviral diseases, representing the fastest spreading tropical illness in the world. It is prevalent in 128 countries, and each year >2.5 billion people are at risk of dengue virus infection worldwide. Neurological signs of dengue infection are increasingly reported. In this review, the main neurological complications of dengue virus infection, such as central nervous system (CNS), peripheral nervous system, and ophthalmic complications were discussed according to clinical features, treatment and possible pathogenesis. In addition, neurological complications in children were assessed due to their atypical clinical features. Finally, dengue infection and Japanese encephalitis were compared for pathogenesis and main clinical manifestations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 250 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 16%
Student > Master 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 14 6%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 103 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 8%
Neuroscience 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 4%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 104 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,940,960
of 25,176,926 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#554
of 7,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,293
of 334,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#9
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,176,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.