↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Separation of Listeria monocytogenes Causing Central Nervous System Infections in Animals

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Separation of Listeria monocytogenes Causing Central Nervous System Infections in Animals
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisandra Aguilar-Bultet, Pamela Nicholson, Lorenz Rychener, Margaux Dreyer, Bulent Gözel, Francesco C. Origgi, Anna Oevermann, Joachim Frey, Laurent Falquet

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is a foodborne pathogen that causes abortion, septicemia, gastroenteritis and central nervous system (CNS) infections in ruminants and humans.L. monocytogenesstrains mainly belong to two distinct phylogenetic groups, named lineages I and II. In general, clinical cases in humans and animals, in particular CNS infections, are caused by lineage I strains, while most of the environmental and food strains belong to lineage II. Little is known about why lineage I is more virulent than lineage II, even though various molecular factors and mechanisms associated with pathogenesis are known. In this study, we have used a variety of whole genome sequence analyses and comparative genomic tools in order to find characteristics that distinguish lineage I from lineage II strains and CNS infection strains from non-CNS strains. We analyzed 225 strains and identified single nucleotide variants between lineages I and II, as well as differences in the gene content. Using a novel approach based on Reads Per Kilobase per Million Mapped (RPKM), we identified 167 genes predominantly absent in lineage II but present in lineage I. These genes are mostly encoding for membrane-associated proteins. Additionally, we found 77 genes that are largely absent in the non-CNS associated strains, while 39 genes are especially lacking in our defined "non-clinical" group. Based on the RPKM analysis and the metadata linked to theL. monocytogenesstrains, we identified 6 genes potentially associated with CNS cases, which include a transcriptional regulator, an ABC transporter and a non-coding RNA. Although there is not a clear separation between pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains based on phylogenetic lineages, the presence of the genes identified in our study reveals potential pathogenesis traits in ruminantL. monocytogenesstrains. Ultimately, the differences that we have found in our study will help steer future studies in understanding the virulence mechanisms of the most pathogenicL. monocytogenesstrains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 12 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,462,806
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#6,071
of 6,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#375,363
of 437,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#107
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.