↓ Skip to main content

Environmental Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Hosted by Free-Living Amoebae

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Hosted by Free-Living Amoebae
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ascel Samba-Louaka, Etienne Robino, Thierry Cochard, Maxime Branger, Vincent Delafont, Willy Aucher, Wilfrid Wambeke, John P. Bannantine, Franck Biet, Yann Héchard

Abstract

Mycobacterium avium subsp.paratuberculosisis responsible for paratuberculosis in animals. This disease, leading to an inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, has a high impact on animal health and an important economic burden. The environmental life cycle ofM. aviumsubsp.paratuberculosisis poorly understood and several studies suggest that free-living amoebae (FLA) might be a potential environmental host. FLA are protozoa found in water and soil that are described as reservoirs of pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria in the environment. Indeed, bacteria able to survive within these amoebae would survive phagocytosis from immune cells. In this study, we assessed thein vitrointeractions between several strains ofM. aviumsubsp.paratuberculosisandAcanthamoeba castellanii. The results indicate that the bacteria were able to grow within the amoeba and that they can survive for several days within their host. To explore the presence ofM. aviumsubsp.paratuberculosisin environmental amoebae, we sampled water from farms positive for paratuberculosis. AM. aviumsubsp.paratuberculosisstrain was detected within an environmental amoeba identified as related to the poorly describedRosculusgenus. The bacterial strain was genotyped, showing that it was similar to previous infectious strains isolated from cattle. In conclusion, we described that variousM. aviumsubsp.paratuberculosisstrains were able to grow within amoebae and that these bacteria could be found on farm within amoebae isolated from the cattle environment. It validates that infected amoebae might be a reservoir and vector for the transmission ofM. aviumsubsp.paratuberculosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,547,596
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#994
of 6,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,450
of 442,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#28
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.