↓ Skip to main content

Protective Role of Rabbit Nucleotide-Binding Oligomerization Domain-2 (NOD2)-Mediated Signaling Pathway in Resistance to Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protective Role of Rabbit Nucleotide-Binding Oligomerization Domain-2 (NOD2)-Mediated Signaling Pathway in Resistance to Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Infection
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mengjiao Guo, Rong Li, Qianqian Xiao, Xiuxiu Fan, Ning Li, Yingli Shang, Liangmeng Wei, Tongjie Chai

Abstract

Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2), a member of the NOD-like receptors (NLRs) family that is well-known to play a key role in innate immune responses and is involved in innate antibacterial responses. In this study, rabbit NOD2 (rNOD2) was cloned from rabbit kidney (RK) cells. It was distributed in various tissues, and the highest level of rNod2 was detected in spleen. Moreover, the expression of rNod2 was significantly upregulated in the heart, liver, and spleen induced by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC). Overexpression of rNOD2 induced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine, including Il1β, Il6, Ifn-γ, and Tnf, as well as defensins, including Defb124, Defb125, and Defb128 through the nuclear factor (NF)-κB signaling pathway. Furthermore, overexpression of rNOD2 inhibited the growth of EHEC, and knockdown of rNOD2 or inhibition of the NF-κB pathway promoted its replication. In addition, our results suggest that rNOD2 can significantly activate NF-κB signaling and trigger antibacterial defenses to increase the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine and defensins after stimulation by EHEC. These findings are useful to further understanding the innate immune system of rabbits and providing a new perspective for the prevention of bacterial diseases in rabbits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Materials Science 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,538,060
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#3,655
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,963
of 329,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#75
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.