You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Role of Pneumococcal NanA Neuraminidase Activity in Peripheral Blood
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00218 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shahan Syed, Pipsa Hakala, Anirudh K. Singh, Helena A. K. Lapatto, Samantha J. King, Seppo Meri, T. Sakari Jokiranta, Karita Haapasalo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,783
of 8,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,333
of 368,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#56
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.