You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Current Sampling Methods for Gut Microbiota: A Call for More Precise Devices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00151 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiang Tang, Ge Jin, Gang Wang, Tianyu Liu, Xiang Liu, Bangmao Wang, Hailong Cao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Norway | 1 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 657 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 657 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 93 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 84 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 61 | 9% |
| Researcher | 54 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 11% |
| Unknown | 259 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 107 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 44 | 7% |
| Engineering | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 92 | 14% |
| Unknown | 286 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,289,241
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#389
of 8,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,443
of 402,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#11
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.