You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Poor Unstable Midgut Microbiome of Hard Ticks Contrasts With Abundant and Stable Monospecific Microbiome in Ovaries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00211 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melina Garcia Guizzo, Saraswoti Neupane, Matej Kucera, Jan Perner, Helena Frantová, Itabajara da Silva Vaz, Pedro L. de Oliveira, Petr Kopacek, Ludek Zurek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Czechia | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,291,825
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1,926
of 8,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,446
of 415,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#56
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.