↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the Concordance Between Urogenital and Vaginal Microbiota: Can Urine Specimens Be Used as a Proxy for Vaginal Samples?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the Concordance Between Urogenital and Vaginal Microbiota: Can Urine Specimens Be Used as a Proxy for Vaginal Samples?
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2021.671413
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah E. Brown, Courtney K. Robinson, Michelle D. Shardell, Johanna B. Holm, Jacques Ravel, Khalil G. Ghanem, Rebecca M. Brotman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 10 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,955,214
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1,358
of 8,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,057
of 454,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#47
of 312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.