You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effective Prophylaxis of COVID-19 in Rhesus Macaques Using a Combination of Two Parenterally-Administered SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2021.753444 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brandon J. Beddingfield, Nicholas J. Maness, Alyssa C. Fears, Jay Rappaport, Pyone Pyone Aye, Kasi Russell-Lodrigue, Lara A. Doyle-Meyers, Robert V. Blair, Ann M. Carias, Patrick J. Madden, Ramon Lorenzo Redondo, Hongmei Gao, David Montefiori, Thomas J. Hope, Chad J. Roy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#14,964,950
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,566
of 8,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,911
of 515,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#123
of 370 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 370 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.