You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vegetation Formation in Staphylococcus Aureus Endocarditis Inversely Correlates With RNAIII and sarA Expression in Invasive Clonal Complex 5 Isolates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2022.925914 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kyle J. Kinney, Jessica M. Stach, Katarina Kulhankova, Matthew Brown, Wilmara Salgado-Pabón |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,133,774
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,000
of 6,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,281
of 435,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#153
of 604 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 604 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.