You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
COVID-19 in pulmonary critically ill patients: metagenomic identification of fungi and characterization of pathogenic microorganisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1220012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Changjun Huang, Siyuan Chang, Rui Ma, Yishu Shang, Yuexia Li, Yun Wang, Min Feng, Wenzhi Guo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Comoros | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,684,843
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,274
of 8,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,968
of 241,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#34
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.