You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Causal relationship between the gut microbiota and insomnia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1279218 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qianfei Wang, Tianci Gao, Weichao Zhang, Dong Liu, Xin Li, Fenqiao Chen, Jianqiang Mei |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,964,950
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,566
of 8,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,640
of 163,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#35
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.