You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ocular surface immune transcriptome and tear cytokines in corneal infection patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1346821 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heba Alenezi, Grant Parnell, Stephen Schibeci, Jerome Ozkan, Mark Willcox, Andrew J. R. White, Nicole Carnt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,997,174
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,974
of 8,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,596
of 158,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#37
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.