↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D effects on Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a case-control and experimental study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin D effects on Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a case-control and experimental study
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1366136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sijia Liu, Tianwei Zhao, Quanzhong Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,990,347
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#3,717
of 8,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,871
of 154,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#43
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.