You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a new loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for the sensitive, rapid, and economic detection of different genotypes of Classical swine fever virus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1372166 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jose Alejandro Bohórquez, Adriana Muñoz-Aguilera, Saraswathi Lanka, Liani Coronado, Rosa Rosell, Mònica Alberch, Carol W. Maddox, Llilianne Ganges |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,440,562
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1,881
of 8,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,807
of 204,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#17
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.